European nations to boycott World Cup if Fifa plans go through
Winners Spain were one of six European teams to reach the quarter-finals of this summer's World Cup

European football's 55 member associations have voted to boycott World Cups if the sport's governing body proceeds with a plan to sell stakes in its competitions to private investors.
The decision was made at an emergency meeting called to discuss the proposal announced earlier this week by Fifa, which oversees world football.
Uefa, which governs European football, had already made its opposition clear by releasing two damning statements - and that strength of feeling has been reaffirmed.
"The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product," it said on Thursday.
"It is one of football's greatest sporting legacies. It has been built over generations by players, national teams and supporters across every continent. No part of it should ever be surrendered to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale."
Uefa's boycott would cover all Fifa competitions, including the men's and women's World Cups and Club World Cup, and be triggered if Fifa president Gianni Infantino's proposals are voted through by member associations.
The first time this stance will be tested at a senior tournament is in October, when the Women's World Cup play-offs are due to be held.
Fifa wants to create a commercial subsidiary to run its main events, including its World Cups, and external investors will be able to buy stakes in it.
It said it would "invite third parties to make minority, non-controlling investments" in a new subsidiary - Fifa Forward Enterprise (FFE).
The plan needs to be passed by a vote of Fifa 211 members.
Infantino has written to them saying they will receive $40m (£30m) if they back his controversial proposal. He has set a deadline of 19 September for federations to accept his plans if they want to access an initial $20m (£15m).
The Women's Under-20 World Cup, which will take place in Poland, starts on 5 September.
If approval is granted for Infantino's plan, Fifa says Thrive Eternal is expected to lead the proposed investor group for FFE.
Thrive is an American venture capital firm founded by Joshua Kushner - the brother of US President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared.
In a statement released after Thursday's meeting, which was held virtually and chaired by president Aleksander Ceferin, Uefa said it and its 55 member associations "stand as one".
"We unanimously and unequivocally reject Fifa's proposal to transfer ownership interests in the World Cup and other Fifa competitions to private investors," it said.
On Wednesday, Uefa had accused Fifa of using football "to enrich themselves and their friends".
Its statement on Thursday was even more damning, calling it "irresponsible and indefensible that a proposal of such significance for football was conceived in secret" and "without any meaningful consultation" with those who steward the game.
It added: "This is not merely a profound failure of leadership, but an abdication of Fifa's duty as the custodian of world football.
"National associations around the world are now presented with an ultimatum: accept the irreversible capture of football's greatest competitions or bear the consequences.
"This is not a 'democratic decision', but governance by intimidation - an act of coercion unworthy of an institution entrusted with the stewardship of the global game."
While Uefa only accounts for a quarter of Fifa's membership, it does include most of the world's most successful teams.
Six of the eight quarter-finalists - including winners Spain - at this summer's World Cup were European. In the 2022 and 2018 editions, the figures were five and six respectively.
Of the 23 World Cups to have taken place to date, 13 have been won by European countries.
A Football Association spokeswoman said England stood "shoulder to shoulder" with its "European colleagues" and "fully support the collective view".
She added: "We oppose Fifa's plans - the Fifa World Cup belongs to football and always will."
The Scottish FA added its support, saying its board "agrees unequivocally with the concerns raised by all members over the manner in which these proposals have been issued, and deadline set, without a full consultation process or consideration to good governance".
Simon Stone - chief football news reporter
There is no doubt in my mind this story equals that of the
European Super League
in being the biggest football has had to deal with.
Transfers are huge, but ESL and now this go to the very heart of what makes football the game it is and the structures that underpin it.
The logical conclusion to the involvement of private investment in Fifa competitions is that, eventually, they will be expanded, both in terms of size and frequency. That squeeze on the calendar would be felt all the way down the pyramids domestically and affect the structure of the game in every single country.
Uefa, which has been criticised itself for expanding its club competitions, knows it has the power to stop the Fifa plan.
A World Cup without European teams would rob it of three out of four semi-finalists from this summer's competition and six of the eight quarter-finalists. Three of the four semi-finalists in the last Women's World Cup were European. Three of the four semi-finalists in last year's Club World Cup were European.
If there are no European participants it is impossible to imagine Fifa generating the amount of revenue commercially needed to pay the sums it is offering.
It cannot be overstated how huge this story is.